💪 CPU Battle #56 Ryzen AI Max 390 vs Ryzen AI Max+ 395 💪

These two processors are not competitors in the traditional sense. They are siblings from AMD’s Strix Halo family, designed for compact workstations and high-end laptops where power efficiency matters as much as raw performance. The Ryzen AI Max 390 and the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 share the same Zen 5 architecture, the same 256-bit LPDDR5x memory interface, and the same 55W default TDP. The difference is core count and integrated graphics: the 390 has 12 cores and 32 graphics cores, while the 395 has 16 cores and 40 graphics cores. Both can be configured from 45W to 120W, giving laptop and workstation manufacturers flexibility in how they tune the silicon.

⚙️ Specifications Comparison

The Ryzen AI Max 390 has 12 Zen 5 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 3.2 GHz and a boost clock of up to 5.0 GHz. It includes 12 MB of L2 cache and 64 MB of L3 cache. The integrated GPU is the Radeon 8050S, with 32 RDNA 3.5 compute units running at 2800 MHz. The NPU delivers 50 TOPS for AI workloads .

The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 steps up to 16 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 3.0 GHz and a boost of up to 5.1 GHz. It also has 64 MB of L3 cache but 16 MB of L2 cache. The integrated GPU is the Radeon 8060S, with 40 compute units running at 2900 MHz. The NPU is the same 50 TOPS XDNA 2 unit .

Both chips support 256-bit LPDDR5x-8000 memory, up to 128 GB, and PCIe 4.0 with 16 lanes. They use the FP11 socket and are manufactured on TSMC’s 4nm FinFET process .

📊 Performance

The performance gap between the two is almost entirely determined by core count and graphics core count. In CPU benchmarks, the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 holds a clear advantage. PassMark’s CPU Mark database shows the 395 scoring 51,761 in multi-threaded tests, compared to 43,124 for the 390 — a 16.7% difference. Single-threaded performance is much closer, with the 395 scoring 4,084 and the 390 scoring 4,021, a difference of just 1.5% . Geekbench 6 results show the same pattern: the 395 scores 2,407 single-core and 20,325 multi-core, while the 390 scores 2,287 single-core and 18,798 multi-core .

The graphics difference is equally clear. The Radeon 8060S in the 395 has 40 compute units; the Radeon 8050S in the 390 has 32. Phoronix’s Linux testing found the 8050S delivering about 80% to 85% of the 8060S’s gaming performance, depending on the title and power mode . In Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p Ultra, Notebookcheck measured the 395 configuration averaging 80.7 fps, while the 390 managed 63.1 fps — a 28% advantage for the flagship . In Baldur’s Gate 3, the gap widened: 99.4 fps for the 395 versus 68.7 fps for the 390 .

🔌 Power and Efficiency

Both processors share the same 55W default TDP and the same 45W–120W configurable range . This means the power difference is not between the chips themselves but between how manufacturers configure them. A laptop with the 390 can be tuned to the same power envelope as one with the 395, and the performance difference will still favor the 395 because it has more cores and more graphics units to work with.

The efficiency story is more interesting. The Strix Halo platform as a whole is designed to deliver discrete-GPU-class graphics performance at a fraction of the power. The Radeon 8060S in the 395 has been shown to match or exceed an RTX 4060 laptop GPU in some games while consuming significantly less power . The 8050S in the 390 is less powerful but follows the same efficiency philosophy: it delivers performance that would have required a discrete GPU a generation ago, at integrated graphics power levels.

🎯 Which Should You Choose?

The choice between these two comes down to whether you need the extra cores and graphics performance for your workload, and whether the price premium is worth it.

Choose Ryzen AI Max 390 if you want the Strix Halo platform’s efficiency and integrated graphics performance but don’t need the absolute maximum. The 390 delivers about 83% of the 395’s multi-threaded CPU performance and about 80–85% of its gaming performance . For a compact workstation used for software development, content creation, or moderate gaming, the 390 is the more sensible purchase. It runs cooler, costs less, and still outperforms most traditional laptop processors in graphics-heavy tasks.

Choose Ryzen AI Max+ 395 if you need the highest multi-threaded performance available in the Strix Halo family, or if your work involves GPU compute that benefits from the extra 8 compute units. The 395 is the chip for AI inference, 3D rendering, video encoding, and gaming at higher settings. It is also the only option if you need the absolute maximum performance in a compact form factor — but you will pay significantly more for it.

Short version:
Choose Ryzen AI Max 390 if you want Strix Halo’s efficiency and graphics performance without the flagship price, and your workload doesn’t need 16 cores.
Choose Ryzen AI Max+ 395 if you need maximum multi-threaded performance and the extra graphics cores justify the premium for your work.

---

Stop using slow, ad-bloated tool sites! 🤮

🔎 Search “KandZ Tools” on Google to use many professional utilities for free.

KandZ.me is the ultimate minimalist hub for:
✅ Finance (Mortgage, Interest, Inflation)
✅ Tech (Base64, JSON, Dev Suite, IP)
✅ Health (BMI, BMR, TDEE)
✅ Productivity (Timer, Workspace, QR)

⚡️ Fast & Private
🔒 No data leaves your device
💎 100% Free

🔗 Use it now: https://tools.kandz.me
🔖 Bookmark it—you’ll need it later!